Silicon carbide high-power devices

10 pages
57 views
of 10
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
Share
Description
Silicon carbide high-power devices
Tags
Transcript
  1732 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES, VOL. 43, NO. zyx 0, OCTOBER 1996 ilicon Carbide High-Power Devices Charles E. Weitzel, zyxwvutsrq enior Member, IEEE, John W. Palmour, Member, IEEE, Calvin H. Carter, Jr., Karen Moore, Member, IEEE, Kevin J. Nordquist, Scott Allen, Christine Thero, Member, IEEE, and Mohit Bhatnagar z Abstruct zyxwvutsrqp n recent years, silicon carbide has received in- creased attention because of its potential for high-power devices. The unique material properties of Sic, high electric breakdown field, high saturated electron drift velocity, and high thermal con- ductivity are what give this material its tremendous potential in the power device arena. 4H-Sic Schottky barrier diodes 1400 V) with forward current densities over 700 A/cm2 at 2 V have been demonstrated. Packaged SIT’S have produced 57 W of output power at 500 MMz. Sic UMOSFET’s 1200 V) are projected to have 15 times the current density of Si IGBT’s 1200 V). Submicron gate length 4H-Sic MESFET’s have achieved fmax = 32 GHz, zyxwvutsr ~ = 14.0 GHz, and power density = 2.8 W/mm @ 1.8 GHz. The performance of a wide variety of Sic devices will be compared to that of similar zyxwvutsr i and GaAs devices and to theoretically expected results. I. INTRODUCTION zyxwv   recent years, silicon carbide has received increased I ttention because of its potential for a wide variety of high- power devices [ 11-[3]. The unique material properties of Sic, high electric breakdown field of 4 x lo V/cm, high saturated electron drift velocity of 2 x lo7 cm/s, and high thermal conductivity of 4.9 Wkm-”K are what give this material its tremendous potential in the power device arena. The data in Table I allows a comparison of the basic material properties of silicon, gallium arsenide, and silicon carbide. The two Sic polytypes that are having the biggest impact on power devices, 6H and 4H, are both listed in Table I. The most significant difference between 6H and 4H is that the electron mobility in 4H-Sic is two times that of 6H-SIC perpendicular to the e-axis and almost 10 times that of 6H-SIC parallel to the c- axis [4]. This fact alone explains the increased importance of 4H-Sic. Sic devices will have better performance compared to Si and GaAs devices for high voltage applications because of Sic’s higher breakdown field, saturated drift velocity, and thermal conductivity even though the electron mobility is lower. Some insight into how these material parameters affect device performance can be seen by studying the various device figures of merit that have been proposed over the last 30 years CS1-[91. Manuscript received October 31, 1995, revised April 30, 1996 This work was supported in part by the Office of Naval Research, Department of the Air Force, Wright Laboratones, and, NASA Lewis Research Center C E Weitzel, K Moore, K J Nordquist, C Thero, and M Bhatnagar are with the Phoenix Coiporate Research Laboratories, Motorola, Inc Tempe, AZ 85284 USA J. W Palmour, C. H Carter, Jr., and S Allen are with Cree Research, Durham, NC 27713 USA Publisher Item Identifier S 00 18-9383(96)07217-6 0018-9383/96 05 High Resistivity zyx r Schottky Contact Epitaxial Drift Layer (t = 10 p Nd ii 1 X Cm-’ Substrate (t = 11 mils) Ohmic Contact Fig 1 edge termination Cross sectional view of a Sic Schottky diode with high-resistivity In this paper, a wide variety of Sic power devices-Schottky and p-n junction diodes, thyristors, UMOSFET’s, SIT’S, RF MESFET’s, and RF JFET’s-will be discussed in terms of fabrication, simulated performance, and state-of-the-art experimental performance. Where possible, the simulated and experimental results will be compared with those of comparable Si and GaAs devices. 11. SCHOTTKY AND p-n JUNCTION DIODES The least complex Sic power device is the Schottky rectifier (Fig. l), which consists of an N oped substrate (thickness % 11 mil) with backside ohmic contact, a lightly doped (1 x 10l6 ~m-~) pitaxial drift layer (thickness M 10 um), and a topside Schottky contact with a high-resistivity edge termination. The Schottky diode is fabricated by evaporating a high work function metal, such as titanium, nickel, or gold, onto the epitaxial layer to form the Schottky contact and by depositing an ohmic contact metal onto the back of the N+ substrate [lo]. The order of these depositions may be reversed to accommodate annealing of the ohmic contact. The high resistivity edge termination is achieved by implanting an inert species, such as argon, which damages the exposed semiconductor causing a high resistivity region. The process is self-aligned to the Schottky contact because the Schottky metal acts as a mask preventing damage under the contact [ 111. The most important device properties are high reverse breakdown voltage and low forward resistance which, in tum, produces a high forward current density. By calculating the specific Ron of Si, GaAs, and 4H-SiC Schottky diodes at various breakdown voltages, the lower resistance of 4H-Sic .OO 996 IEEE  WEITZEL zyxwvutsrqponmlkj t zyxwvutsrqponmlkjih l : SILICON CARBIDE HIGH-POWER DEVICES 1733 zy 1 "E zyxwvutsrqponmlkji   0.01 zyxwvutsrqpo c K U = - . 10 4. :: TABLE I MATERIAL ROPERTIES OF SILICON, GALLIUM RSENIDE, ND SILICON CARBIDE (6H AND 4H) Fotward Voltage V) 0 2 4 6 8 10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . - Analytical Results GaAs - - 4H-Sic- :Si Si , 4H-SICi . GaAs H-Sic xperimental zyxwvutsrqp  0 0 zyxwvutsrqp / ata : Forward Current /e zyxwvut  U .: / / __--- / Schottky diodes at high voltages can be easily quantified. The Schottky diode specific Ron is the sum of the epitaxial breakdown field of 4H-Sic becomes the dominant parameter drift layer and the N+ substrate resistances both of which are and the 4H-SiC Schottky has the lowest specific Ron. These calculated using (1) where zyxwvuts   s layer thickness, Nd is layer analytical results show that the specific Ron of a 1000 V 4H- doping, and pUn s electron mobility [12]. Sic Schottky is 15 times lower than that of a 1000 V GaAs Ron,sp = w/(qNdh). (1) The drift layer doping density determines the breakdown voltage and drift layer thickness is chosen so that deple- tion layer punch-through occurs at the same voltage as the avalanche breakdown. For these calculations, the substrate is assumed to be 5 mil thick and doped 1 x 1020cm-3. The substrate ohmic contact resistance is assumed to be zero for all three materials. Using readily available [4], [13], [14] doping dependent material parameters, the analytical results (solid and dashed lines) are shown in Fig. 2 where specific Ron for Si, GaAs, and 4H-Sic is plotted versus breakdown voltage. At low-breakdown-voltages, the specific Ron for each material is dominated by the specific substrate resistance. For higher breakdown voltages, the drift layer must be thicker and have a lower doping density both of which increase the specific Ron. At low voltages, GaAs Schottky diodes have the lowest specific Ron, ut at sufficiently high voltage 2200 V the higher Schottky and over 200 times lower than that of a 1000 V Si Schottky. Experimental results for GaAs and 4H-Sic Schottky diodes are included to help validate the modeled results. GaAs diodes (open and solid squares) with 200 V and 610 V breakdown voltages have 682 A/cm2 and 500 A/cm2 forward current densities at 2 V, and 1.43 mO-cm2 and 2.04 mR- cm2 specific Ron's, respectively [15], [16] The specific Ron's were measured at large forward voltages (1.5-2.5 V) where the forward current density saturates and series resistance limits conduction. The 200 V GaAs diode is a Schottky diode and the 610 V GaAs diode is a merged p-i-n Schottky (MPS) which includes a p-i-n diode in parallel with the Schottky diode [16], [ 171. Forward biasing2 p-i-n diode causes minority carrier injection which significantly reduces the specific R,,, and therefore the specific Ron for the GaAs MPS diode is below the modeled Schottky diode curve. The forward and reverse I-V curves for a 4H-Sic Schottky diode (solid ellipse)  1734 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICE$, VOL. 43, NO. 10, OCTOBER 1996 zy Anode Ohmic Contacts zyxwvuts   zy I N-type I Epitaxy Cathode Ohmic Contact Fig. 4. Cross sectional view of mesa isolated, n-p-n-p Sic thyristor. are plotted in Fig. 3. This diode has 732 A/cm2 forward current density at 2 V, 1.5 mR-cm2 specific Ron, nd 1400 V breakdown voltage which were achieved with a 10-pm-thick epitaxial drift layer doped 7.5 zyxwvutsr   lOI5 cmP3 and argon implant damage termination [ll]. The argon implant dose was 1 x cm-' at an energy of 30 keV. This particular diode has higher than desired reverse leakage current. Recently, other workers have reported 4H-Sic Schottky diodes (solid and open circles) with 2 m0-cm2 and 1.4 mR-cm2 specific Ron and 1000 V and 800 V breakdown voltages, respectively [18], [19]. A somewhat more complex device is the p-i-n diode which substitutes a P+ epitaxial layer and a p-type ohmic contact for the Schottky contact. A 21000 V p-n diode which incorporates a mesa edge termination lhas been demonstrated with 6H-Sic [20]. An RIE defined 6H-Sic mesa p-i-n diode with a 4.5 kV blocking voltage has also1 been demonstrated using a 45 pm thick N- drift layer (1 x ~m-~) nd a 1.5 pm thick P+ contact layer [21]. 111. THYRISTORS For very high-voltage l(5 kV-10 kV) applications, such as traction control and high-voltage DC transmission, Si bipolar devices have much lower on-resistances than unipolar devices, such as MOSFET's. The same is expected to be true for Sic bipolar devices. At these very high voltages a single Sic thyristor could replace a stack of several Si thyristors and thereby achieve a lower forward voltage drop. In addition it is expected that properly designed Sic bipolar devices, which take advantage of the high-breakdown electric field of Sic, will have lower voltage drops than corresponding Si bipolar devices. This is expected to be the case in spite of the higher built-in voltage for Sic junctions. The most promising Sic thyristor structure to date has been an n-p-n-p de;ice (Fig. 4) in 4H-SiC, the design of which has been reported previously [22], because it allows the use of a low-resistivity n-type substrate. The mesa structure was utilized with all the doping being done in zyxwvutsrqpon itu during epitaxial growth [23]. The device periphery was terminated using a reactive ion etched mesa. Early 4H devices showed a forward blockiiig voltage of -375 V with zyxwvu A = 3.21~10-~ m2 1.5 zyxwv   1.0 -0.5 -1.0 -2.0 1.5 L 4H-Sic npnp Thyristor -2 -1000 -800 -600 -400 -200 0 200 400 600 800 1000 CATHODE VOLTAGE (V) Forward and reverse bias I-V characteristics of a 600 V 4H-Sic cm2 If = 1 8 A at Fig. 5 n-p-n-p thyristor at 27 OCThe area is zyxwv .2 x 7 v no gate current. The voltage drop for a current of -1 A (1000 A/cm') was -4.0 V. The low on-resistance of the 4H devices resulted in a lower voltage drop for a current density of 500-1000 A/cm2 than for 6H devices, despite the higher built-in potential of 2.85 V for 4H as compared with 2.6 V for 6H. High-temperature measurements on these earlier 4H thyristors confirmed their capability to successfully operate at 500 C with a cathode voltage of -200 V. At 500 C, the forward breakover voltage with no gate current was still above -200 V and the leakage current at -160 V was only 5 pA (4.8 x A/cm2). This yields a high on-off' current ratio of lo5 at 500 C which is adeptable for a power switch. More recently, n-p-n-p 4H-Sic thyristors have achieved blocking voltages of 600 V in both forward and reverse bias, as shown in Fig. 5. The forward characteristic for this thyristor is in the third quadrant because the gate electrode is made to n-type material and the P- epitaxial layer supports the reverse breakdown voltage. The forward breakover voltage could be reduced to less than 30 V with a gate current of -2.5 mA (0.77 A/cm2). After the forward current snaps back at a holding current of 2.3 mA, the device has a rated forward current of 1.8 A (563 A/cm2) with a voltage drop of 3.7 V. The cathode leakage current at a forward bias of -500 V was only 3.7 nA at 27 C, yielding an on-off ratio of 5 x lo8. A larger area thyristor (1.61 x lo-' cm2) had a 10 A rated on-current and blocked 200 V in both directions. Initial measurements of lower voltage thyristors indicate that 4H-SIC thyristors have turn-off times ranging from 360 ns to 640 ns. Fast turn-off times indicate that these devices can operate at much higher frequencies (> 150 kHz) than typical silicon thyristors [23]. IV. UMOSFET'S The Sic UMOSFET (Fig. 6) has a backside drain ohmic contact, N+ doped substrate (thickness zy N 11 mil), and epitaxial  WEITZEL zyxwvutsrqponmlkj t al : SILICON CARBlDE HIGH-POWER DEVICES zyxwvutsrq Source Ohmic Contact zyxwvutsrqp   Oxide Drain Ohmic Contact Fig. 6. inversion layers formed at the p-type layer-oxide interfaces. Cross section of a Sic UMOSFET. Source to drain current flows in drift layer similar to that of the Schottky diode. The upper portion of the UMOSFET contains an epitaxial p-type layer, ion implanted N+ source contact regions, and a source ohmic contact. The upper portion of the UMOSFET is enclosed by trenches which contain metal or polysilicon gate electrodes which are spaced from the p-type layer and n-type drift region by the gate oxide Si02 [22], [24]. The device fabrication starts with an zyxwvutsr   Sic substrate on which is grown in succession the n-type drift layer and the p-type layer. The N+ source contact regions are typically implanted at an elevated temperature and activated at an even higher temperature [25]. RIE is used to form the trenches on either side of the p-type layer zyxwvutsr 26], 27]. After the gate oxide (Si02) is grown and annealed [28], ohmic contacts are formed on the source and drain areas [29]. Finally the gate metal and interconnect metal is defined. During device operation current flows from the N+ source contacts through an inversion layer (minority carriers) at both vertical surfaces of the p-type layer across the n-type drift layer (majority carriers) to the N+ substrate. The current flow from source to drain is controlled by the potential on the gate electrode. The higher forward current density of an ideal 1200 V 4H-SIC UMOSFET compared to those of a 1200 V vertical silicon MOSFET and a 1200 V Si IGBT is shown by the analytical and experimental results in Fig. 7. The Si and 4H- Sic MOSFET’s analytical results (solid lines) were calculated based on a design approach that minimizes R,, for a given breakdown voltage [30]. Inversion layer electron mob 1000 cm2/V-s and 20 cm2/V-s were assumed for the Si and 4H-Sic UMOSFET’s, respectively. In spite of the extremely low 4H-SIC inversion layer mobility, the ideal current density of the 4H-Sic UMOSFET is 100 timeshigher than that of a Si MOSFET primarily because of the much lower specific R,, of the 4H-Sic drift layer. An experimental data point for a typical 1200 V, 10 zyxwvutsr   Si IGBT is also included in Fig. 7 for comparison. This device has a 2.5 V forward voltage drop at an operating current density of 75 A/cm2 [31]. The analytically expected current density of the ideal 4H-Sic UMOSFET is 15 times higher than that of a present day, state-of-the-art typical Si IGBT. At present Sic UMOSFET’s are in an early stage of development and must be impro.4 significantly to reach the potential illustrated by the ia+I analytical data shown . -/ - zyxwvutsr R E 3 1735 loooo U C zyxwvut   . CI e f a 1000 100 10 1 4H, Ma del 4H-Sic UMOSFET (260V) Experimental Experimental 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 Forward Voltage (V) Fig. 7. Current density versus forward voltage of ideal 1200 V Si and 1200 V 4H-Sic UMOSFET’s (modeled), a typical 1200 V Si IGBT (experi- mental), and a 260 V 4H-Sic UMOSFET (experimental). IIIIII T=300K 1.6 1.2 0.8 0.4 0 0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10 DRAIN VOLTAGE (V) Fig. 8. I-V curves of a large area (0.01 cm’), 2 A 4H-Sic vertical UMOS power FET showing the low-voltage, high-current characteristics. Specific R,, = 13.2mQ-cm’. in Fig. 7. Experimentally, the first vertical UMOS power FET’s in 4H-Sic were capable of blocking 150 V and had a current rating of 67 mA (100 A/cm2) at Vd = 3.3 V which corresponds to a specific R,, of 33 mR-cm2 [14]. The I-V characteristic of the largest 1 x cm2) and highest current 4H-Sic UMOSFET achieved to date is shown in Fig. 8.  This device has a blocking voltage of 175 V, a drain current of 2 A (200 A/cm2) at zy d = 2.65 V, a transconductance of 454 mS (5.3 mS/mm), and a specific R,, of 13.2 mR-cm2 at a gate bias of f20 V. On the other hand, the highest voltage 4H-Sic UMOSFET has a 260 V blocking voltage, a current rating of 100 mA (100 A/cm2) at Vd = 1.8 V, and a specific R,, of 18 mR-cm2 [23].  1736 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES, VOL. 43, NO. 10, OCTOBER 1996 z Source Ohmic Contact zyxwvutsrq   Drain Ohmic Contact Fig 9 Cross sectional view of a Sic static induction transistor (SIT) Current flows vertically from source to drain subject to Schottky gate control. - Experimental data from the highest blocking voltage (260 V) 4H-Sic UMOSFET is also included in Fig. 7. The current density of the 260 V 4H-Sic UMOSFET is approximately one order of magnitude below that of the ideal 1200 V 4H- Sic UMOSFET. The lower than expected current density of the present 4H-Sic UMOSFET’s is most likely a result of its very low inversion channel mobility (7-12 cm2/V-s) [32]. Higher inversion channel mobilities are expected from improvements in Sic oxidation technology. It is expected that with improvements in SIC material quality, fabrication processes, and device design additional increases in breakdown voltage will be realized. The reader is cautioned not to draw any conclusions about the relative merits of the 260 V Sic UMOSFET and the 1200 V Si devices because these devices have significantly different breakdown voltages. The 4H-Sic experimental data is plotted in Fig. 7 to show the, as yet, unrealized potential of 4H-Sic UMOSFET’s. V. SIT’s (STATIC NDUCTION RANSISTORS) The cross section (Fig. 9) of a Sic SIT bears a resemblance to that of the UMOSFET (Fig. 6), but the details of its structure and method of operation are significantly different. Like all of the previously discussed devices, the SIT is a vertical device with an ohmic source contact on the top and an ohmic drain contact on the back of the wafer. Between these two N+ regions is an N- epitaxial drift layer whose doping is one of the factors that determines the device breakdown voltage and pinch-off voltage. Trenches are etched to define the channel region and Schottky gate contacts are formed in the bottom and along the sidewalls of the trench. Majority carriers flow from the source contact to the drain contact through an accumulation layer in the n-type channel region. By applying a negative voltage to the gate contact the current flow can be modulated and even decreased to zero when depletion regions under each gate contact meet in the middle of the channel. In DC operation the drain current does not saturate, but resembles that of a vacuum triode [33]. 6H-Sic SIT’s have achieved a blocking voltage of 120 V, a channel current of 350 mA/cm, and a transconductance of 4.0 mS/mm. A single 1 cm periphery 6H device delivered 0.35 W/mm power density and 10 combined chips delivered 38 W pulsed power at 175 MHz [34]. Using - Ohmic Schottky zy P uffer N-type Substrate Fig 10 Cross section of an RF SIC MESFET Current flows laterally from source to drain confined to the n-type channel by the P- buffer layer and controlled by the Schottky gate electrode. 0.5 pm lithography, 4H-Sic SIT’s achieved a current density of 100 mA/mm of source periphery, a voltage gain of 15, a transconductance of 7.5 mS/mm, a blocking voltage of 200 V, and a cut-off frequency fmax of 4 GHz. Packaged transistors (4.75 cm periphery) delivered 57 W pulsed output power with 43% power added efficiency at 12 dB gain at 500 MHz [35]. Packaged transistors with combined 16.5 cm periphery delivered 225 W output power with an associated gain of 8.7 dB at 600 MHz [36]. This power density (1.36 W/mm) at 600 MHz is significantly higher than the 0.76 W/mm at 225 MHz and 0.52 W/mm at 900 MHz achieved with Si SIT’s [37]. VI. RF MESFET’s Unlike the preceding devices, Sic RF FET’s are lateral devices with both source and drain contacts on the top surface of the wafer (Fig. 10). Source and drain ohmic mntacts are typically placed on top of an zy   epitaxial-layer and are separated by a more lightly doped 1 x n-type channel region. The majority carriers flow in the channel from source to drain and are controlled by a Schottky gate contact. Typically device isolation was achieved with a P- buffer layer on a conducting substrate. More recently h&- resistivity substrates have been used in place of the P- buffer layer to achieve higher cut-off frequency devices 7381. The superior power density capability of 4H-Sic RF MESFET’s is demonstrated by the analytical and experimental results shown in Fig. 11 [39]. The device parameters which were important in differentiating the power density of the Si, GaAs, and 4H- Sic MESFET’s were low field electron mobility, breakdown field, and electron saturation velocity. At a doping density of 1 x 1017 cm-3 the electron mobility of 4H-Sic is 560 cm2/V-s which is slightly lower than that of Si (800 cm2/V-s) and significantly lower than that of GaAs (4900 cm2/V-s). On the other hand, the breakdown field of 4H-Sic is 10 times that of Si and GaAs, and the saturated drift velocity is 2 times that of Si and GaAs. The experimental data give added credibility to the analytical results. Si LDMOS data was substituted because of the unavailability of Si MESFET data [39]. At low voltages, GaAs MESFET’s, which have higher electron mobility, have the highest power density [40]. The higher power density of Sic MESFET’s is only achieved at drain voltages higher than those normally used with either Si or GaAs devices. It is
Related Search
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks